Although a controversial topic, we have moved onto political views, somewhat, and are analysing what we believe Greta Thunberg to be and what she stands for.
I, personally, believe that she is brave and informed when she speaks. She speaks with confidence and she knows what facts will cause the older generation she does slightly target, to turn tail. While I can understand how the older generation may denounce Theta for being just a child who shouldn't be involved in such things, it doesn't mean they can't learn and move onto newer beginnings with new information. She proves her point not just with emotion but with scientific facts. I find her as a person to be an interesting character with a strong opinion. Whether she is the right or wrong I cannot speak.
After watching this video ---->
What does the presenter suggest?
He suggests that Greta Thunberg is a pawn in the political scheme to bring up the issue of Climate Change. He likely believes Climate Change is a hoax and he refers to Greta as a hysterical child. He leaves no room for other opinions as he forces the idea that his own bias opinion that Greta should not be speaking like this.
How are children constructed?
They are seen as hysterical and emotion-driven people, the bias watchers who believe the presenter's bias opinion that children should not be involving themselves in politics. They are not taken seriously as the facts that they do present are completely ignored for the intention of focussing on hormonal issues within teenagers so the older generations have something to blame on their strong opinions.
What is the viewer's position?
The likely position of the watcher of this program would likely be members of the older generations who do agree with the presenter's opinion.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.